IPC-6013 Requirements for Flexible PCB Manufacturing Explained
- Flex Plus Tech team
- Dec 29, 2025
- 4 min read
IPC-6013 is often mentioned in flexible PCB projects, but in real manufacturing, it is rarely treated as a checklist that manufacturers simply “follow.” Instead, it functions more like a decision framework—one that affects how materials are chosen, how processes are controlled, and how risk is managed across the entire production flow.
From a flexible PCB manufacturer’s point of view, understanding IPC-6013 is less about memorizing clauses and more about knowing which requirements truly matter for reliability, and where problems are most likely to occur if those requirements are ignored.
IPC-6013 in Real Manufacturing: More Than a Formal Standard
In practice, IPC-6013 becomes relevant the moment a flexible PCB moves from design intent to physical production.
Unlike rigid PCBs, flexible circuits introduce variables that are difficult to correct later in the process—bending stress, adhesive behavior, copper fatigue, and dimensional movement under heat. IPC-6013 exists because these risks cannot be fully controlled by general PCB standards.
For manufacturers, IPC-6013 helps answer practical questions such as:
How much process variation is acceptable for flexible materials?
Which defects are cosmetic, and which are structural risks?
How should inspection focus differ between consumer and high-reliability products?

Which Flexible PCBs Are Actually Evaluated Under IPC-6013
IPC-6013 applies to most flexible circuit constructions, including single-layer, double-layer, and multilayer flexible PCBs, as well as rigid-flex boards when used together with related standards.
What matters in production is not the board type alone, but the combination of materials and structure, such as:
Adhesive-based vs. adhesiveless constructions
Copper thickness in bending areas
Coverlay design and opening accuracy
These factors directly influence how IPC-6013 requirements are interpreted on the shop floor.
Understanding IPC-6013 Classes from a Manufacturer’s Perspective
IPC-6013 defines three classes, but in manufacturing, the difference between them is not theoretical—it changes how strictly each process step is controlled.
Class 1: Functional, Low-Risk Applications
Class 1 products typically allow more flexibility in appearance and long-term durability. Manufacturing focus is on basic functionality rather than extended mechanical life.
Class 2: The Most Common Production Reality
Most industrial and automotive flexible PCBs fall into Class 2. At this level:
Process stability becomes critical
Repeated bending and thermal exposure must be considered
Inspection criteria are more clearly enforced
For manufacturers, Class 2 is often the balance point between cost, yield, and reliability.
Class 3: High-Reliability Means Low Tolerance for Risk
Class 3 flexible PCBs demand tighter control at nearly every stage. Minor defects that might be acceptable in Class 2 can become rejection issues.
From experience, Class 3 is less forgiving of:
Marginal adhesive bonding
Copper grain weakness in bend areas
Dimensional movement during thermal cycles
Manufacturing Areas Where IPC-6013 Has the Biggest Impact
Not every IPC-6013 requirement carries equal weight in daily production. Some areas consistently have a greater influence on reliability.
Copper Behavior in Flexible Areas
Copper integrity is one of the most critical concerns in flexible PCB manufacturing. IPC-6013 highlights limits that help prevent:
Micro-cracking during bending
Fatigue failure after repeated motion
Weak points caused by inconsistent copper thickness
In real production, these risks are managed through material selection and bend-area design, not inspection alone.
Coverlay Bonding and Alignment
Coverlay-related issues account for a large percentage of flexible PCB defects. IPC-6013 requirements focus on:
Proper adhesion to base material
Accurate opening alignment
Absence of delamination or lifting
Once coverlay bonding problems appear, they are rarely correctable downstream.
Hole and Interconnection Reliability
For flexible PCBs that include plated holes or rigid-flex structures, IPC-6013 sets expectations for plating quality and hole integrity. These requirements become especially important during thermal cycling and assembly.
Dimensional Stability During Processing
Flexible materials naturally respond to heat and mechanical stress. IPC-6013 addresses acceptable limits to ensure the circuit remains compatible with SMT assembly and final integration.
Inspection Under IPC-6013: Preventing Risk, Not Just Rejecting Boards
Inspection based on IPC-6013 is most effective when it is used to identify trends, not just to pass or fail individual panels.
In manufacturing environments, inspection typically focuses on:
Early detection of structural defects
Monitoring process drift
Preventing latent reliability issues from reaching assembly
This approach reduces rework and helps stabilize long-term production.
Why IPC-6013 Should Influence Design Decisions Early
Many flexible PCB issues attributed to manufacturing actually originate in design. IPC-6013 provides guidance that helps designers understand how class selection affects:
Material choice
Bend area layout
Manufacturing yield and cost
Designs that ignore IPC-6013 constraints often require process compromises that increase risk during mass production.
Applying IPC-6013 in Flexible PCB Manufacturing at Flex Plus
At Flex Plus, IPC-6013 is used as a reference framework throughout flexible PCB manufacturing rather than a final inspection filter. Based on customer requirements, we align materials, processes, and inspection criteria to support IPC-6013 Class 2 and Class 3 applications.
This approach allows us to manage reliability risks earlier in the process and maintain stable quality across different flexible PCB projects.
Conclusion
IPC-6013 is not simply a document to be cited in specifications—it is a practical tool that shapes how flexible PCBs are manufactured, inspected, and validated for real-world use.
Understanding how IPC-6013 requirements translate into manufacturing decisions helps engineers and buyers reduce risk, improve reliability, and avoid costly revisions later in the project lifecycle.

